How The Queen Looked
The next image was a pattern mask, but the AI has picked out the same face style as the above. Consitant with the date of the image.
A non-academic historian explores real life and issues. Incorporating the Real Chart.
This has been transferred from the weekly section.
While doing the 1983 charts I came up with the idea of doing what the top 100 would look like if I just based it on the total sales of each record in the chart. So I did the chart for the 24 July like that, I also worked out what the previous week would have been like, and included that in the last week column. The weeks would be the same of course. I couldn't do the highest position one, because that would have required many weeks of charts to do. I am including the chart below to show you. Some notes of explanation are needed. The red pen lines show you what will drop out. As you can see they are all over the place, not just at the bottom of the chart! Such a chart would see records drop out from number one! New Order's record would have spent 2 weeks at the top. Sales with the same figures are placed in order of the same chart as presented. This chart is also a one off!
I should point out that you could do this with any other charts if you know the weekly sales figures. Even those by the OCC.
First off the 24 July chart without the adjustment and then the chart with.
I spent a great deal of time helping to develop this excellent training centre in Sheffield, rising at one time to become Chairperson of the project, all on a voluntary basis. So I would like to show some of the memories and mementoes of the project. Which by the way is still running a providing courses still.
It's where I learned my computer skills from by the way!
First of a promo video done for the centre in the 1980's. It's a VHS copy by the way. It features me and many other people. Narrated by Carol Jenkinson, who is still involved with project.
Next up some photos of the Lord Mayors Parade Sheffield (1992). The new Mayor was a local Manor Councillor William Jordan, who sat on the board of Matrec, so that's why Matrec had a float!
Above the float itself!
Outside Matrec. Alison Robinson, Carol Jenkinson, Dave Clarson, Liz Fox plus others.
Again outside. Barbara Harrison, Alison, Gwen Schofield, Carol, Jenean Berry, Steve Fox, Larry and Kate Roberts.
Steve Fox, Me and Sandra Jordan (no relation to William the Mayor).
The next picture is me being presented with my South Yorkshire Open College pass by Bill Jordan at the Matrec presentation day at the Manor Community Centre on the 20 October 1988
It was common for Matrec to do certificate presentations at the Community Centre, since the Matrec buildings didn't have a room big enough to hold the vast numbers of students. End of term parties were also held there, with presentation first and then fun afterwards. The booze supplied by Wards!
A real life case of reincarnation, with a personal twist for me
| Carole Lombard |
![]() |
| MW |
I have argued for some time that the current UK charts done by the Official Charts Company are manufactured to make the charts represent those based on the past, when a single copy sold had the power to effect the chart. But since the introduction of the 12 inch single that has ceased to represent the chart truly. The situation got worse with the introduction of the download and went off the scale with streaming.
So what has changed. Well back in the early days records were priced all the same just about. So adding up the copies was the easiest way to measure popularity of the records. But the 12 inch single was more expensive than the standard 7 inch. So the people who bought these was forking out more money than the other people buying 7 inch. When downloads came around the price went down to 99p. But by then 7 inch singles were nearly £4. So now the 7 inch was being underrepresented by the price difference. Even before this happened the price of 7 inch records was being reduced down to encourage high first week sales. With dealers offered deals on the price of records. They could sell so many at reduced price, if they sold so many at full price. This lead to some singles entering at the top of the charts when they were first issued. Due to a very low price. The download did the same. And when iTunes issued singles for just 59p instead, when the Real Chart ended in 2020 it was who was top of the cheap that week.
Streaming created a bigger problem. To get a representation of the copies sold system, the OCC made it that so many streams equals one download sale. They have had to adjust this level from time to time to keep the same level of copies sold. They also made it impossible for anyone who streams records to actually have enough streams to make one copy or the equivalent download. Which meant if you download a record or purchase a single, you can influence the chart, but if you stream you can't, at least not on your own. The next problem with streaming is that once you have bought a record, you do not need to buy it again. But you never buy a streamed record, it's like renting. You constantly pay. But this means that streamed records sales only slowly die off. Till the public are fed up with it. So to get round this problem after so many weeks the OCC limits the streams of the records and put them at a much lower level. This adjustment generally takes out the record at number one. So very long runs at the top of the charts are reduced. This adjustment can be reset if the record company request it. Or some special event happens.
There is of course another way to prevent these effects and return the chart to the public chart, not manufactured to fit a copy based system. And that is to count retail sales not copies.
How: Well you count what the public pay for music. The more money you pay the higher the chart position.
So a download would be 99p or 59p or whatever price the retailer sells them at.
A 7 inch single would be whatever the price is charged. Some of these can be much higher too.
The same with the 12 inch single and the CD single etc.
Streaming is more complex. Most sites charge around £10.99 a month for the service. Trying to work out how many people stream the records per month is complex, but the average family streams 2,000 tracks per month. Of course the charts company would need to establish how much a typical stream for each site costs. But based on the monthly cost and 2,000 streams it works out at £0.005495 per stream. Or £0.005p per stream.
With these figures you can use all the streams for each site and add the sales up. Not the number of streams. Then you add on the price of each record, CD, download to the total.
Such a system would have produced a new number one on the OCC chart this week
28 February 2025 - 6 March 2025
(1) Kendrick Lamar ~ Not Like Us
36 Oasis ~ Whatever
The above is the current chart for the OCC
However thanks to the figures supplied by Alan Jones, I can show that under the retail system the number one would change.
The Streams of Kendrick show 2,791,53 on Spotify for the week. Other sites do list them, but Spotify has the most. The streams thus amount to £13,957.51p
The OCC says he sold 777 downloads at 0.99p = £769,23p
Now the Oasis record The OCC says it sold 11465 on 7 inch. The price is not fixed but the average seems to be £15.95p So £182,866.75p
Plus 684 downloads at 99p £677.16p
So you can see that Oasis would have topped the chart instead of being 36!
Unfortunately the OCC don't reveal the breakdown of the records and only Alan Jones tells you some times, but not all the time.
Remember these are based on what the public pay. Not on what an artist get in terms of royalties.
Update 23 March 2025
Update 18 April 2025
With retails sales of over £161,578.95p on vinyl alone, Taylor Swift feat. Post Malone Fortnight [10,105 vinyl] would easily top the chart. With only retail sales of around £24K Alex wouldn't even make the number two. As that would go to Charli xcx & Billie Eilish Guess [5,616 vinyl] = £99,463.68p.
Update 25 April 2025
As the OCC figure for streams total of Alex is 6,411,100.(1) If you
allow £0.005p per stream, that gives him £32,055.50p. (2) The downloads
come to £1,877.04p. Nevertheless, the DC Fontains figure for vinyl at
£14.99p comes to £37,744.82p, which would make them top of the chart.
This figure does not include all of their sales, which might come from
CD singles - total sales (5,804 sales). A big difference from No 89 to
one!😲
(1) 100 streams per unit (2) Not taking into account add funded streams.
Update 2 May 2025
(55) Oasis - 7,620 at £13.99p = £106,603.80p
(1) Alex - streams = £33,551.50p + Downloads = £2,118.60p
However, the cat amongst the pigeons might be (2) Pink Pony Club, as this is also on Vinyl at between £11.99 and £24.99. Jones doesn't say what the breakdown of the 37,923 units is. But at 24 in the physical chart it must be less than 7,000.
1000 singles at £24.99p would put sales of £24,990.00p. With downloads at 0.99p added it could put her ahead of Alex, though neither would beat the Oasis sale.
DC Fontains would not drop out of the 100 as the did on the OCC chart, as it was number 2 on the physical chart of the OCC.
Update 13 June 2025
Sabrina Carpenter Retail Sales total: £87,830.17p. The breakdown thus:
7 Inch £12.99 - 4,501 = £58,467.99p
Downloads - £0.99p - 992 = £972.18p
Streams Total 5,688,000 - £0.005p = £28,440.0p = based on 100 premium streams only!
Update 28 September 2025
There would be a new number one this week, for Lewis Capaldi Something In The Heavens
Sales breakdown - £53,039.63p or £127,922.63p. The second figure based on £3.99 for CD singles, though most seemed to be for sale at £0.99p. = CD 24,961, 7-inch 1,126 sales, download sales of 2,944 units, sales-equivalent streams of 20,647.
Huntr/x (KPop Demon Hunters Cast) Golden
Sales breakdown - £35,202.34p = 24 CDs, 1,892 digital downloads, 65,939 sales-equivalent streams
Update 21 November 2025
RAYE - WHERE IS MY HUSBAND! Would top the sales chart this week I believe based on the following figures:
Vinyl sales at £5 = £11,380
Rest of the sales = 46,924 - 2,276 = 44,648 sales at 0,005p per stream = £22,324 + £11,380 = £33,704
Taylor Swift = Downloads £1,740.42p Streams £25,880 = £27,620.42p
Raye's total would of course be higher if it contains downloads in the 44,648 figure. As this figure is not broken down by Jones.
Christmas Number One 2025
Retail sales for Kylie - XMAS
CD £4.99 = £15,568.80pFirst what is a Catch Point? Well in real life railways they are a point or switch to derail. You might be thinking that the whole purpose of a railway is to keep the rolling stock on the track. But before wagons were fully braked, they could run down the track and block or hit another train. So Catch Points were added to the start of the siding before it joined the main line, so that any rolling stock running away, could be derailed before it hit the main line.
In Model railway terms not many companies make them and they are not cheap to buy. The one featured in the following picture is made by Peco. Typically priced between £10 to £15 online, but that does not include postage!
This one is set not to derail. They do look better if you weather them, remember the rail to nowhere would be covered in rust, even on the top! Loco's will loose power on the painted rail, but it's going to fall off anyway! See below:
So how do you make one? You need a damaged or old point. Needless to say you must have a switch blade of the point that can still be moved. Plus it must be the side of the deflection line.
You then go to work with a track cutting tool. The picture below shows you were to cut the track with the cutters using the arrows as a guide. I find the best tool are "snips" which will cut through anything.
You can also do this to a Hornby point. I have started on the one below. Hornby point blades do have a circular clip that holds them on, but you can cover this up with a thin balsa piece. I have yet to remove the unused point switch and cut away the remains of where the rail layed.
My computer system was getting a bit old and so I was looking at building a new system. If you are building a computer up from scratch I have found an excellent site called PCPartPicker. This allows you to select the various parts and shows you what is compatible with any parts you select. It also compares the parts prices on websites. It can be used by anyone around the World as it will select the supplies in your region of the World. It's free to join and doesn't cost you anything. There's even a forum that you post questions about your build.
Everything is purchased for the build. I have gone with an ASUS Z690-A motherboard. The test was carried out, but I hit a problem with the memory modules. I went with the Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB. It comes in two 16GB sticks. But the yellow light on the computer board came on, indicating a problem with these. I tried them all in each of the four slots, both together and alone, but no result. Checking around the web showed this was a problem with them and that motherboard. So I purchased two Kingston Fury Beast and fitted them in the suggested slots. Still no result! So I removed one and it worked!! It still wouldn't boot! This time the light came on for a problem with the hard drives. It doesn't tell you which. I suspected one or more of the SATA cables. Four altogether! So I order some more, these came in threes so I ordered two packets. These came during the heatwave. So I wasn't going to mess around with the computer in that! So the operation was put on hold till the following week. When I made some progress with the device. I did replace the cables, but it made no difference! Looking on-line I found a helpful result. Apparently the green/yellow LED also tells you if you have no operating system installed as it can't boot from that! Also that the direct HDMI connector to the Monitor doesn't show the motherboard system. So I used an adaptor which had the multi pin and one horizontal flat pin to an HDMI connector. And the screen came to life! I quickly was able to establish that all the Hard Drives were working, but it seems some of the fans were in the wrong sockets! So I changed them over. It's not clear which sockets are for fans as some are listed for both the fan and water cooling devices! I was also able to fit the other Kingston in the first black socket and got that to work.